well the way the system works is really busted anyways, it turns into a "i'll vote for A so B doesn't win" or "i sorta like A i guess" rather than "i believe in C" because the voting system is flawed horribly
this is because of whoever has the most votes win which sounds find in practice but.
Let's say Candidate A wins the election with 25%, with Candidate B having 23%, Candidate C having 22%, Candidate D having 16% and Candidate X having 14%. Now it makes sense that Candidate A won, he had the most votes but that's more than 75% that didn't want Candidate A to win.
So along comes the next election and the voters have lost faith in Candidate X and Candidate D, instead voting for Candidate A and Candidate B, who have
some of the policies that Candidate X and Candidate D had but also a few they don't agree on but you gotta work with what you get. Candidate A wins again, followed by Candidate B and Candidate C with similar numbers to last time.
Comes the next election Candidate C is abandoned and split in two, with the voters voting for similar reasons before or to prevent the other one from getting into office because they disagree with them. This takes away votes from Candidate A as well, in a sense, and Candidate B wins the election with a 55% to 45% pool and now the political voting is now a stale pool of no actual choices being made but going with the "best option" which is dumb.