nfs future

Yes, but if you are extremists (like myself and a couple of others) that are into this kind of thing it does mean a lot.

i know this idea is from carbon, but how about making your own team

Dunno about that... the last time EA did that they only made one of the groups actually useful (Blockers).

I say this again and again: Where are the bikes? A decent 1000cc Superbike with a jet kit or to be more extreme, a turbocharger (The Ghost Rider's turbo'd Busa immediately springs to mind) would absolutely annihilate a supercar, especially in acceleration and handling.

Uh not against the likes of the Ariel Atom it wouldn't considering even a 1000CC plus motorbike still doesn't have as much power as even car with a V6 say and that's the V6 at stock!
In any case the Ariel Atom has a supercharged Honda Civic Type R engine going to 300bhp and it still whips the motorbikes.

They may be able to beat the Lotus Elises and Exiges, but that's also unlikely given also the low weight and ride of the Lotus' and of course their amazing handling abilities.

In addition, although it may seem like there isn't really that much of a difference between cars and motorbikes in physics there actually is quite a difference especially in the tyres of which I went into detail it would confuse people.

bikes, yes

as for the other cars i said it once and ill say it again

i dont care about what cars have been missed since we already have a topic about and since there is over 3 mil cars in the world you have to make some cuts

I totally agree with that.

Same here, dudes.

On 21-May-2008 Kenny 2x4 said:

Uh not against the likes of the Ariel Atom it wouldn't considering even a 1000CC plus motorbike still doesn't have as much power as even car with a V6 say and that's the V6 at stock!
In any case the Ariel Atom has a supercharged Honda Civic Type R engine going to 300bhp and it still whips the motorbikes.

They may be able to beat the Lotus Elises and Exiges, but that's also unlikely given also the low weight and ride of the Lotus' and of course their amazing handling abilities.

In addition, although it may seem like there isn't really that much of a difference between cars and motorbikes in physics there actually is quite a difference especially in the tyres of which I went into detail it would confuse people.

No duh there's a massive difference, but bikes have MUCH, MUCH better power-to-weight ratios than cars, and the Ariel Atom is an exception, because it is built to be a bike beater. And handling on superbikes is much better than on Elises and Exiges anyway, no matter what. And 1000cc bikes aren't built for outright power, but power-to-weight ratios. For example my mums CBR1000RR may "only" have 176 horsepower, but it only weighs around the same amount. Top speed? in excess of 300kph, so that eliminates quite a few tuners, tuned or not, eliminates a few supercars, quite a few muscle cars, you get my point?

I think I got it...

On 22-May-2008 Murcielago said:

No duh there's a massive difference, but bikes have MUCH, MUCH better power-to-weight ratios than cars, and the Ariel Atom is an exception, because it is built to be a bike beater. And handling on superbikes is much better than on Elises and Exiges anyway, no matter what. And 1000cc bikes aren't built for outright power, but power-to-weight ratios. For example my mums CBR1000RR may "only" have 176 horsepower, but it only weighs around the same amount. Top speed? in excess of 300kph, so that eliminates quite a few tuners, tuned or not, eliminates a few supercars, quite a few muscle cars, you get my point?

300kph being a mere 186mph which so many supercars can beat.
Names include the Ferrari Enzo, Ferrari F430, Ferrari 430 Scuderia, Ferrari 612 Scaglietti, Mercedes Benz SLR-Mclaren, Mercedes Benz SLK, Mercedes Benz AMG55, Caparo T1, Bugatti Veyron, Aston Martin DBS, Aston Martin V12 Vanquish...
I would go on, but do you get my point?

In addition, the Lotus cars have been put in comparison tests with motorbikes and Lotus came out on top.

« Last edited by Kenny 2x4 on May 22nd 2008 »

Wow, it has, Kenny?

Ahem....

Considering that my mum's bike cost a mere AU$16,000, it is much better value than any of the cars you mentioned, including the Ariel Atom. And bikes excel in acceleration, for example the there are only a select few million-dollar supercars that can beat the Suzuki GSX1300R's 2.8 sec 0-60.

Even if you get the most expensive superbike in full production, the Ducati 1098R, you still get better value (cost is about US$40,000 I think), better handling with adjustable suspension and traction control and a 200hp engine in race trim. And weight? A very slim 165kg.

On 22-May-2008 Murcielago said:

Ahem....

Considering that my mum's bike cost a mere AU$16,000, it is much better value than any of the cars you mentioned, including the Ariel Atom. And bikes excel in acceleration, for example the there are only a select few million-dollar supercars that can beat the Suzuki GSX1300R's 2.8 sec 0-60.

Even if you get the most expensive superbike in full production, the Ducati 1098R, you still get better value (cost is about US$40,000 I think), better handling with adjustable suspension and traction control and a 200hp engine in race trim. And weight? A very slim 165kg.

Dude, your mom is rich!

..........

No....

AU$16,000 is actually quite minuscule for a vehicle. And plus, SIC EM, her ol' Rex, was sold because it cost too much to keep running. She's not that rich.

On 23-May-2008 Murcielago said:

..........

No....

AU$16,000 is actually quite minuscule for a vehicle. And plus, SIC EM, her ol' Rex, was sold because it cost too much to keep running. She's not that rich.

AU$16,000 minuscule for a new car, yes.

as for minsule for an older vehicle - no, since my car cost me AU$800

This is AU$16,000 for a brand new bike, only 10 kays on the clock.

also they should have hurricanes

What do you mean?

yea they should make a new one with rain

Ok, I think EA should remake NFS Pro Street, because I think it was a great game, and i tell you why.
1. It covers a variety of different racing modes than most nfs games.
2. The car tuning and physics is better than most nfs games.
3. It was the first nfs game with realistic graphics.
4. The most flexible vinyl options.

What the remake should improve on or add.
Improvements
............
-Make it a simulation game with the latest graphics.
-Most sim racing games do not capture car physics on the road. stability and grip should be a focuss to compare with reality

Features to add
- Day and Night
- Ability to do legal and illegal races
- police are back and better then ever
- Ability to choose race locations and modes in street racing (create your own race)
- Ability to add new cars and tracks.

This game would sell off.