1969 Man on the moon

Do you think Neil Armstrong and his crew actually landed on the moon and have a stroll around or do you think the whole thing was a con job by the U.S. to save face in the space race with Russia? I used to have no doubt in my mind that those astronauts landed on the moon but after seeing the equipment they used for myself I'm not so sure, it all looks too flimsy and most of it is not much thicker than tin foil, hardly protection enough from radiation rays. I'm beginning to wonder if perhaps the whole thing was filmed in a studio by Stanley Kubrick.

I sometimes seriously think that in terms of the timeline and the technology available at that time that no they didn't

I watched this video and now I'm convinced. Shane doesn't lie.

Great video danielroxheaps, I'm getting really suspicious now, no stars, flag waving in the wind, prop 'C' rock, reflection of stage light on the astronauts helmet, shadows not in the correct place, no crater where their ship landed, and random wires.

testuser said:

Erm...are we okay?

testuser said:

You alright there?

No, this thread makes me sad.

Bottom line is the astronauts would not have survived the Van Allen Belt radiation, they would have been cooked alive like microwave food. When NASA is asked how the astronauts managed to survive they cannot give an answer. Neil Armstrong refused to do interviews, he once replied 'don't ask me any questions and I won't tell you any lies'.

« Last edited by Sanzano on Oct 13th 2016 »

Don't really care since so many have been there since. lol

testuser said:

No, this thread makes me sad.

Why?

« Last edited by danielroxheaps on Oct 15th 2016 »

danielroxheaps said:

testuser said:

No, this thread makes me sad.

Why?

10s of thousands of people worked for years and years to achieve one of the greatest feats of human engineering, exploration and endeavour. Problems were overcome, lives were lost, and more than one nation competed for the goal. Eventually it was accomplished. Both nations involved and thousands of independent scientific monitors around the world watched and recorded the signals from the moon to verify it. But today we look back from a world where it's easy to fake things, where all of our entertainment is so fake that anything can happen and talking animals can sell us products through computer graphics and photoshopped videos and we decide that the past was fake too. And youtube 'celebrities' build their fame, and presumably their fortune, by spreading national enquirer level drivel that's more fun to listen to than investigating for yourself.

Sorry, rant over.

« Last edited by testuser on Oct 14th 2016 »

Ok that's not a rant you need to read some of my older posts xD

And quote needs spacing.

I wouldn't be so sceptical if the moon landings didn't occur during the presidency of Richard Nixon. That guy along with the CIA were involved in all sorts of cover ups, scandals and controversies. It got so bad Nixon had to resign as President. Apparently on his death bed Stanley Kubrick admitted he filmed the whole thing and his wife later confirmed it. I have no doubt they went into space, I just don't believe they landed on the moon.

This thread is depressing :/

You commies.

Surely it can't be fake. There would've been footage and people that saw the rocket launch into the sky.

Yeah, the rocket launched at Cape Canaveral or wherever, it just didn't land on the moon. Look at the way the ship is perfectly positioned on the moon without any burn marks or crater where it landed, very suspicious.

Yep, Sanzano is now a conspiracy theorist. Careful, he'll convince you!

Well he's convinced everyone except me and Jake.