WHY RAIKOU LEFT (ND please read)

Well, maybe she can still talk through me? There's still hope, yeah. I can tell her what whoever said, then she can say what I should say for her. See?

It's her own fault she can't post.

Nitrazius, thats your opinion, keep it to yourself.

Its all because of their little dating thing.If that hadnt happened then shed be talking to us right now.Fools.

yeah,

On 09-Feb-2005 problemsolver said:

Nitrazius, thats your opinion, keep it to yourself.

No, why should I?

it's the truth. SHE told her parents.

Imagine your her mum/dad: your 15 (is that right?) year old daughter comes up and tells you she's dating someone on the internet. And you hear in the news about pedophiles and all those other nasty guys. Your paternal/maternal instincts kick in, because you're worried it's a pedophile.

The warnings at the top of the page indicators that the internet isn't safe.

true it was dumb, but still is sad......

yeah

On 09-Feb-2005 Nitrazius said:

No, why should I?

it's the truth. SHE told her parents.

Imagine your her mum/dad: your 15 (is that right?) year old daughter comes up and tells you she's dating someone on the internet. And you hear in the news about pedophiles and all those other nasty guys. Your paternal/maternal instincts kick in, because you're worried it's a pedophile.

The warnings at the top of the page indicators that the internet isn't safe.

Although it's sad that she's gone, I'd have to agree with Nitra's statement. Pedophiles (or however you spell it) are not nice people on the internet and you really can't tell whether a person is a pedophile or not. I read an article about pedophiles in a paper once, it's sad that they do this particulary to teenage girls (like me, yike!)

On 09-Feb-2005 Nitrazius said:

No, why should I?

it's the truth. SHE told her parents.

Imagine your her mum/dad: your 15 (is that right?) year old daughter comes up and tells you she's dating someone on the internet. And you hear in the news about pedophiles and all those other nasty guys. Your paternal/maternal instincts kick in, because you're worried it's a pedophile.

The warnings at the top of the page indicators that the internet isn't safe.

They are both 13.

ND: Thank you for pointing that out before I could. (not being sarcastic)

Nitra & Dingo: While there are bad people over the Internet, we don't happen to be some. We've sent each other pictures of ourselves, proving that we are who we say we are. You want more proof?

I don't need more proof, slifer. I know that both you and Raikou are 13. Nitra was just pointing out that her parents would be worried, that's all. I have to agree with him there but I know that neither you or Raikou are bad people. I was just pointing out that girls are the "bad people's" main targets which is why her parents would be worried, that's all!

On 08-Feb-2005 joslifer1 said:

Well, maybe she can still talk through me? There's still hope, yeah. I can tell her what whoever said, then she can say what I should say for her. See?

How can I trust that you won't modify the posts she makes to some extent?...

Nitra has a point about phedofiles...

yeah

On 10-Feb-2005 joslifer1 said:

ND: Thank you for pointing that out before I could. (not being sarcastic)

Nitra & Dingo: While there are bad people over the Internet, we don't happen to be some. We've sent each other pictures of ourselves, proving that we are who we say we are. You want more proof?

Before I respond to this, I'd like to answer ND: So what they're both 13? That doesn't change anything.

Quoted person: "While there are bad people over the Internet, we don't happen to be some". What do I have to back that up? Your word. And your word, like everyone elses, means diddly squat on the internet.

"We've sent each other pictures of ourselves, proving that we are who we say we are." Sending pictures is hardly foolproof. All you need to do is google, and you can have photos of 13 year old boys which you can then claim to be yourself.

In short, you don't understand what I'm trying to say.

On 10-Feb-2005 joslifer1 said:

ND: Thank you for pointing that out before I could. (not being sarcastic)

Nitra & Dingo: While there are bad people over the Internet, we don't happen to be some. We've sent each other pictures of ourselves, proving that we are who we say we are. You want more proof?

So you cant talk to her eh? well figures...put yourself in HER situation right now. There are a ton of queers out there that like to find out info on girls, and they want to do stuff to them *ish, but true* even thought you might be rolling your eyes right now saying 'you sound like my mom', but o well bite me. You might not be bad people, Nitra, Dingo, ND, whoever else is 'normal', her parents dont know it, and they just want to protect her...im sure we will all miss her, but life goes on...*saddend by his own words, James logs out*

On 11-Feb-2005 Nitrazius said:

Before I respond to this, I'd like to answer ND: So what they're both 13? That doesn't change anything.

Quoted person: "While there are bad people over the Internet, we don't happen to be some". What do I have to back that up? Your word. And your word, like everyone elses, means diddly squat on the internet.

"We've sent each other pictures of ourselves, proving that we are who we say we are." Sending pictures is hardly foolproof. All you need to do is google, and you can have photos of 13 year old boys which you can then claim to be yourself.

In short, you don't understand what I'm trying to say.

It is possible to make the pictures foolproof, actually. Jo can take a pic of himself standing next to a computer showing that he is logged in, with him holding a paper saying "Love ya, Rai."

You'd have to have a pretty good digital camera and be a good photographer to do that ...

Our one is bad

Actually, holding a sign saying "I'm blabla" isn't entirely foolproof either.

Ever heard of photoshop?