Super DBZ vs BT2?

So is someone gonna close this yet ? no one's replied in like 2 months or something .

So? It doesn't have to be closed just because no one replied in it. It's still a legit topic.

So I think they are both unique, but if you want a kiddish game then BT2 is the one with a great storyline.

The harder game is definitely Super DBZ. What do you think is better?

SDBZ is harder?,Yeah right, DBZ BT2 will be harder with 100+ characters to unlock.

it's harder to battle the computer.

On 14-Aug-2006 SS 4 Baby Vegeta said:

SDBZ is harder?,Yeah right, DBZ BT2 will be harder with 100+ characters to unlock.

Remember how easy they were to unlock on BT1? It's going to be the same thing.

And I am talking about the battles. They are going to be mega super easy. Espicially to do moves you have to press 1 button, and you got an ultimate attack.

SDBZ you have to push a series of buttons in a combo form to get an ultimate attack, which I think is cooler.

And even the developers admitted that the game will be realllly easy, and is targeted to younger kids.

yep it's not hardcore at all.

lol, If it isn't, then it would be rated 'E', but i bet y'all $100 it will be Rated 'T', and come on, BT1 characters weren't EASY to unlock, those fusing capsules thing was annoying, you had to get the right capsules for the right fusion.

I'm looking forward to the tag team system in this game, the story mode will be better because it's like Budokai 3!

On 16-Aug-2006 SS 4 Baby Vegeta said:

lol, If it isn't, then it would be rated 'E', but i bet y'all $100 it will be Rated 'T', and come on, BT1 characters weren't EASY to unlock, those fusing capsules thing was annoying, you had to get the right capsules for the right fusion.

They can't rate it E due to the violence. But still younger audience can go and buy it with no problem.

And getting a hundred percent on hard in 25 hrs is pretty easy to me. =)

« Last edited by superman4u on Aug 17th 2006 »

On 15-Aug-2006 superman4u said:

Remember how easy they were to unlock on BT1? It's going to be the same thing.

And I am talking about the battles. They are going to be mega super easy. Espicially to do moves you have to press 1 button, and you got an ultimate attack.

SDBZ you have to push a series of buttons in a combo form to get an ultimate attack, which I think is cooler.

And even the developers admitted that the game will be realllly easy, and is targeted to younger kids.

I can see what u mean in respects to that, but i guess each of the ways adds further appeal in they own way.

On 17-Aug-2006 superman4u said:

They can't rate it E due to the violence. But still younger audience can go and buy it with no problem.

And getting a hundred percent on hard in 25 hrs is pretty easy to me. =)

Yeah, too you, but we aren't all like you, huh Sujith?.

So it was actually hard for you?

And by the sounds of it, SDBZ didn't get so hot ratings from top rated sites.

I wonder what BT2 would get. =)

maybe an 8 or 9.

[i][/i]That's what I was thinking.

I was think 8, 9, or 10, lol, i say 10.

But u know how it is some critic-type person will come along and say that its rubbish blah,blah,blah and give it a 6 or 7.

Yeah, if they want to rate it they should play it first.

They do play it first. Ign gave BT1 a 7/10. Whcih I personally think it deserved atleast an 8. I thought that B3 deserved a 7.5/10.

And then 7/10 for B2, and 6/10 for B1.

They should've gave BT a 8/10, atari didn't work on that game for nothing.

i would give it a seven because of its graphics (the hands were practically squares and rectangles) but the gameplay was ok. the other bad thing was the stoory mode way to easy