Well... The whole Gaylo thing is completely their opinion, but ask them why they think it is so bad next time, just tell them it makes them sounds like idiots... Which it does. Anyways, I think Call of Duty 4 has a great online system, it has many different game types to choose from varying from small 1v1s to large 8 vs 8. Although ranking up is an annoyance many people like that how you can choose and customize your own gun on Call of Duty 4. In my eyes, it seems kind of unfair. If there is some new player to COD4 how exactly do you expect the player to go against a 3rd prestige 52 or something with a Deagle and P90? That's where Halo 3 defeats COD4 in my opinion. COD4 is more of a more intense shooter where you have to have a radar up so you can hit the enemy with an airstrike, while your under fire as well. Halo 3 has many different features to relax with such as forge, custom games, racing and much much more. And as I stated before the weapon thing is annoying, but in Halo 3 everybody has access to the weapons on the map. Now, Army of Two vs Halo 3. Army of Two is annoying IMO. I beat the campaign and it's rather short, plus the AI is such trash on it that it's almost impossible to have a good time on single player, so basically if you don't have a friend over or a good connection and a friend on live... Well, you can basically call it quits on that game. So yeah, Call of Duty 4 and Halo 3 are both great games, but in the end Halo 3 seems to reign superior. Don't just take my word for it though, take others as well.
Signature and avatar done by Vasco the noob.