Biggest flunk of man?

On 13-Jan-2009 Nashdar said:

Wanna be my buddy


About the whole NASCAR thing, I hate NASCAR, and I also do beleive it justs wastes so much gas on something so pointless. Might be one of the biggest flunks on my list.

Aren't we already buddies? 8D

Definatly cars theyve destroyed the earth as we know it

Nuclear Bombs.

If anything is a stupider, even more idiotic invention than nuclear missiles in the present, I'll cut off my hand.

On 13-Jan-2009 Seos san Nekros said:

I lol'd when I saw texting included on a list of potent atrocities.

The Bomb has nothing on da pwr of txt spk.

If you get a text message tht rds lk dis, you can ignore it. If somebody bombs your house, on the other hand...

Everyone is saying nuclear bombs but there was something worse the ATOMIC BOMB that the US fired on the Japanese killing millions of civilians because the thought it was the only option there are always at least 2 options for everything (the 2nd option my be harder) and the radiation from it is still screwing up the world today.

« Last edited by 47 on Jan 15th 2009 »

On 12-Jan-2009 PhilXZ said:

What do you think is the biggest mistake man made?

Nuclear power, now we can't get rid of it.

The biggest mistake man has made?

Nuclear power or pron.

On 13-Jan-2009 PhilXZ said:

One flunk would be man itself. The earth was perfectly fine without us for 100 millions of years. We haven't even been here full million and look what we've already done!

This is exactly where my post on page 1 comes in.

Jaffa: If I get a txt msg dat rds lk dat, I have to go to the person's house and murder them. Meanwhile, my house gets bombed and I don't mind so much because I'm not in.

47: 'Nuclear bomb' and 'atomic bomb' are two different terms for exactly the same thing.

Curry : I thought they were two different types but okay.

... okay biggest mistake.. can't say that. so i'll do with

Artificial Chemicals that are put into food designed to make the people who consume it ill. That just the American side... which really would have alot to repent for -_-.

But as for man kind. i'll go with Microwave. Why worry about a nuclear bomb exploding on u when u just eat a variation of the radiation, and bath in it every day?
... i probably should have said that either..

Without doubt it has to be nuclear power, the whole world now fears some mad dicatator getting hold of a nuclear bomb and starting world war III.

i agree with sanzano. war isnt the answer nor is nuclear war. hell nuclear war whould be worse

On 17-Jan-2009 CurryMonster said:

Jaffa: If I get a txt msg dat rds lk dat, I have to go to the person's house and murder them. Meanwhile, my house gets bombed and I don't mind so much because I'm not in.

47: 'Nuclear bomb' and 'atomic bomb' are two different terms for exactly the same thing.

Very logical. But by the same token, text speak, apparently, gives you a reason to murder someone. Shouldn't you be eternally grateful to it for that?

« Last edited by Seos san Nekros on Jan 19th 2009 »

Is the atmosphere of any interest to anyone? Pretty sure we screwed up there.

On 19-Jan-2009 Seos san Nekros said:

Very logical. But by the same token, text speak, apparently, gives you a reason to murder someone. Shouldn't you be eternally grateful to it for that?

I'm not sure "he refused to use proper English so I shot him" would stand up in court.

Well maybe the Nuclear Bombs and such were a big mistake, but look at the Cold War, not a single bullet fired from the U.S. or Russia yet so many Nuclear Weapons created which in turn created so much Nuclear Waste. If world leaders could just stop and think of what they learned in Middle School about the Laws of Thermodynamics and that no matter or energy ever "goes away" or "disappears" it just takes another form. Our main problem is how much we "waste" because we basically only use 15% or less of the energy from fossil fuels and other objects yet the other 85% is turned into a form that we cannot use or transform into something we can by our own means (e.i. we burn fuels and make carbondioxide but we cannot fix change it back into the oxygen or fuel that we used to make it, the only thing that can happen is for plants that we also destroy daily to change this carbondioxide into more oxygen but that's only half of the matter we used the other half is turned into heat/energy which is dispersed until the air reaches an equilibrium. Until world leaders can find a way to fix our waste problems we will continue to create more waste. And this so called "research" to find new ways to produce environmentally friendly ways of producing energy while also reducing waste while not do very much because by the time they do find a new way of making environmentally friendly ways of producing energy, they will have wasted so much energy researching and testing these methods that it will take centuries for the natural order of the environment to convert back into a better state were there is less waste.

EDIT: You have to love how I just typed more than everyone else who posted before me combined.

« Last edited by JBraz3 on Jan 20th 2009 »

The products mankind has created that are damaging the ozone layer is a major problem which will affect future generations as the situation gets worse.

On 20-Jan-2009 JBraz3 said:

Well maybe the Nuclear Bombs and such were a big mistake, but look at the Cold War, not a single bullet fired from the U.S. or Russia yet so many Nuclear Weapons created which in turn created so much Nuclear Waste. If world leaders could just stop and think of what they learned in Middle School about the Laws of Thermodynamics and that no matter or energy ever "goes away" or "disappears" it just takes another form. Our main problem is how much we "waste" because we basically only use 15% or less of the energy from fossil fuels and other objects yet the other 85% is turned into a form that we cannot use or transform into something we can by our own means (e.i. we burn fuels and make carbondioxide but we cannot fix change it back into the oxygen or fuel that we used to make it, the only thing that can happen is for plants that we also destroy daily to change this carbondioxide into more oxygen but that's only half of the matter we used the other half is turned into heat/energy which is dispersed until the air reaches an equilibrium. Until world leaders can find a way to fix our waste problems we will continue to create more waste. And this so called "research" to find new ways to produce environmentally friendly ways of producing energy while also reducing waste while not do very much because by the time they do find a new way of making environmentally friendly ways of producing energy, they will have wasted so much energy researching and testing these methods that it will take centuries for the natural order of the environment to convert back into a better state were there is less waste.

EDIT: You have to love how I just typed more than everyone else who posted before me combined.

tl;dr. And no, there's probably more text on the preceding two and a half pages than in your post.

At least it's revelent quality post CurryMonster which is more than can be said for your last post.